Posted by: Patrick Mosolf | Monday, 21 July, 2008

Dissecting the New World Order Conspiracy

A few months ago, by coincidence, I met two people on the same day who believe in the same conspiracy theory about the world.

The conspiracy goes something like this: The world is being run by a small group of people involved in a few secret societies, the Bilderberg group, the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, etc., with the Yale Skull and Bones Society thrown in.

The Conspiracy has trace elements of Anti- Semitism thrown in, as it involves allegations that major powerful Jewish families such as the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers are among the major players in a plan to control the world through the financial system. The main conspiracy theory has some variations which are either more extreme or more rational. The more extreme version, which was proposed by one of the two people I met, claimed that those elites which are in control of the world, actually worship the devil in the form of an ancient Egyptian God which takes the form of an owl, and represents money. In other words, instead of worshipping God, these elites worship money. They practice human sacrifice at Bohemian Grove, a place where these elites meet somewhere in California.

The slightly more normal form of the conspiracy theory, which I call “World Conspiracyism” was popularized in the video Zietgeist. I watched a short, ten minute part of this film on YouTube, and which can be seen here.

This conspiracy holds that, in addition to the idea that the world is being controlled by a small group of people that are using the financial system, that 9/11 was planned and orchestrated by the government to justify limiting civil liberties. It also alleges that there is a plan, not discussed publicly and hardly known, to form a North American Union which would erase borders between Mexico the US and Canada. Eventually all the world would be united under one world government. And in this world, everyone would be required to have an RFID chip implanted in their body, with which all of their movements and financial transactions could be tracked. Basically, a person could not exist without this RFID chip. The video consistently refers to “they” or “the men behind the curtain”, without really clarifying who “they” are, except with reference to Bush, Nelson Rockefeller, and the Council on Foreign Relations.

Of course, the actions of the Bush administration have made people vulnerable to this kind of theory, because Bush has done a number of things to limit civil liberties. But it doesn’t mean that these rights will never be regained by Americans.

The video, which speaks in ominous tones designed to make us feel fearful and shocked, discusses a proposed North American Union. The Wikipedia entry on the North American Union states that there is no intention for an North American Union, according to the leaders of the three countries, although a lone American University Professor has advocated for a North American “Community”. Wikipedia says that:

The Task Force’s recommendations included developing a North American customs union, common market, investment fund, energy strategy, set of regulatory standards, security perimeter, border pass, and advisory council, among other common goals.

Even if such a Union were planned, it doesn’t seem to me that it is such a cause for alarm. The video alleges that it is being implemented without anyone knowing about it or even discussed in Congress, but it seems hard to believe that it would be accepted without at least approval by Congress. The fear that it will somehow negate the Bill of Rights in the Constitution is only a concern if the Bill of Rights is NOT replaced by some similar guarantee of liberties. Further, in comparison with the European Union, I would say that Americans currently have fewer rights than Europeans, except the “right” to bear arms. (see here) (see Global Research on  North American Union)

The idea that all of the “Unions” (like the African Union and the Asian Union) of the world will one day be united in a “World Union”, is still a bit far- fetched, as the African Union and ASEAN are still quite limited in the degree of cooperation. I’ve never even heard of the Asian Union. Even if it were true, I cannot see why this need be cause for immediate alarm- in fact it may be better to have a world government for a variety of reasons (which I would discuss in another post).

One of the main pieces of evidence in the movie relies on the testimony of person named Aaron Russo, who was a film producer and ran for Governor or Arizona as a Republican. He is basically a Libertarian, though, as he founded his own party and spoke at the 2000 Libertarian Convention. He claims that he was friends with Nelson Rockefeller, and that Rockefeller offered him to become a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and that Rockefeller hinted at the 9/11 attacks, months before they actually happened, as a ruse to further the agenda of world domination and reduction of civil liberties, including the use of the RFID chip. This means that the US government actually coordinated the 9/11 attacks.

Of course, this all depends on the credibility of Aaron Russo. (see here) Unfortunately we can’t submit him to a lie detector test because he has since passed away. I’m not sure why Rockefeller would befriend such a person, who is a relatively low level politician with Libertarian views, who had made his negative views on NAFTA and a National ID card known in a TV show which he released on video. Further, why would Rockefeller reveal these plans to a person who would be so likely to oppose them (due to anti-NAFTA and Libertarian tendencies)?

The idea that 9/11 was conducted by the US government seems unlikely to me, though I have never investigated the claims and conspiracies. Al Qaeda has claimed responsibility for the attacks, and recently blamed the origin of the conspiracy theory on Iran and Hezbollah, saying that it had traced the origin of the theory to those two sources. It claims that Iran and Hezbollah did this to prevent Al Qaeda from getting credit for the attack. Of course, there are some who deny that Al Qaeda exists, but that is getting really far- fetched I think. Ask a Pakistani whether they think Al Qaeda exists.

The RFID chip, which is covered near the end of the video, is perhaps the most interesting and concerning part. It is alleged that the RFID chip is already in the new US passports (as of 2006). Further, the video reveals that some people have already had the chip implanted, or had their children implanted.

I think this is a valid concern, although the Wikipedia entry on the subject clarifies that the chip cannot be read at a distance greater than a few hundred meters, making it difficult for the RFID chip in its current form to be used by governments to track passport holders while they are overseas. Another concern raised in this article is that unauthorized people may be able to access the person’s passport information using RFID readers. (see here)

Personally, I can’t see any reason for the use of the RFID chip, and if anyone uses it, it should be purely voluntary. The inclusion of the RFID chip in the passports of several countries without any input from its citizens is a violation of the principles of a free and democratic society. It seems like just another form of modern technology that is being forced upon us.

The video in general plays on trends common among some citizens of the US, including irrational fears of the United Nations, and fear of socialism. Its not only a world government that is alleged, but a SOCIALIST world government. Why this is so frightening for some of these people probably has more to do with their misunderstanding of what socialism is, and its many different forms. It is perhaps associated with denial of civil liberties as in former Communist states. However, I think this is totally irrational as the US is obviously one of the most capitalistic in the world, and some socialistic programs, such as socialized health care, have nothing to do with a denial of civil liberties. In fact, they may give greater freedom, as people would be freed from onerous medical care payments. High payments for health care can lead people to get into debt, and force them to undertake more work in order to pay for it.

While talking about this with one of my friends, I stumbled upon the idea that these conspiracy theories may actually be a form of psychological warfare, which is used to confuse people and cause them to lose trust in their government. Its not really clear who is behind these allegations, although one of the distributors of the videos, polytyk, is linked to an Islamist website. (see polytyk) Further, the idea that conspiracy theories can be used to harm a body politic is revealed by the Mitrokhin archives. These archives from a former KGB agent reveal that the KGB propagated a conspiracy theory that the US government killed Martin Luther King, Jr.

Overall, there is little doubt that groups like Bilderberg and the Trilateral Commission exist. But I think that their alleged power is probably vastly exaggerated. They may have a lot more power than most, but there will always be certain things that are beyond their control. Further, since the conspiracy theories can not be proven to be true or false (because the meetings of these groups are secret), it falls outside the realm of science and becomes totally the realm of belief. In fact, these groups are the perfect realm for conspiracy theories, because by their secretive nature, their actions and intentions can never be known, and the theories never be validated or debunked.

A few years ago, I was watching a BBC documentary discussing The DaVinci Code, saying that it is a trend in modern Western societies for people not to believe their governments, and common explanations for things. Perhaps this is good thing, especially if it leads people to be more active and to investigate things more deeply. But a fair amount of skepticism is needed when approaching these theories, and it certainly is no reason to bury one’s head in sand in fear.

add to del.icio.us : Add to Blinkslist : add to furl : Digg it : add to ma.gnolia : Stumble It! : add to simpy : seed the vine : : : TailRank : post to facebook

web statistics


Responses

  1. So, after a few months and a 10 minute look at Zeigeist , you come to the incredible conclusion that the New World Order conspiracy is strange paranoia.

    Well done to you. Unfortunately for you, It takes a lot more research to understand. I personally have studied this for a decade, others for up to 50 years.

    Try reading government and UN documents as well as CFR publications and declassifed materials where they outline this agenda and use the term New World Order. You can start with Professor Carrol Quigley and his book tradegy and hope.

    Before calling this a conspiracy, get your fact straight.

  2. Hey AntiReptilian,

    Thanks for your comment. Its good to contribute to the discussion. I invite you to write a guest column on this subject if you would like to share your perspective more thoroughly. You can write another comment or write to the e- mail on the “About” page.

    Its not the first time I’ve encountered this kind of conspiracy theory- the kind of Free Mason conspiracy theory has been around for a long time.

    Plus I’ve been in the business of considering different political theories for a long time, so I consider that experience, as informed by my own political studies and my own understanding of what the problems in the world are, to be a valuable base to start from.

    At the same time, I don’t know everything about it. You mentioned some key documents- would you mind sharing the links with readers?

    Thanks for your reference to Carrol Quigley- I don’t know if I can get this book immediately, but will try in the longer term.

    It wouldn’t surprise me if the Council on Foreign Relations had plans for some kind of world government, but my difference is over whether this would be a good or bad thing. Of course, if it is a kind of controlled world as alleged in the video, then that would be awful. But I don’t necessarily think that is actually what it would be. And even if they have their plans, there are vast obstacles to it. Imagine trying to persuade Mugabe or Ghadafi to join in a world government run by a bunch of Euro elites!

    As I said, I think there is a lot of fear mongering in this video (and other similar videos). Sources are also often blurred.

    And even though the term “New World Order” may be used, why is this phrase in itself such a cause for alarm? It is only when it is associated with fear and eerie music that it comes to seem so nefarious.

    I think there’s no doubt that it is a “conspiracy theory”, the question is whether it is a VALID conspiracy theory.

    I haven’t read anyone who has written de-bunking this theory, so I think my blog post was a worthwhile contribution.

    After writing this post, I thought more about the Global Research article. It seems that the source of at least some of these ideas are actually Right Wing sources.

    I want to reinforce my point also, that the actions of the Bush administration and the War on Terror have provided encouragement to this kind of theory.

  3. PM

    No doubt, the war, and the information flow that has been enabled through the internet has seen the advancement of theories. It has also seen the advancement of human understanding.

    The great philiosophers realised that we cannot analyse something when we embedded within it. For example, we as humans are stuck on planet Earth. We can look out into space, but, at this point in time, even our closest sister planet is beyond our reach and analysis. We are restricted to look from afar and theorise on the nature of the universe. Because we cannot see that life exists on Mars, we believe that there is no life on Mars. That, of course, does not mean that life does not exist there. We are slaves to our circumstances.

    This is the fundamental problem with human understanding of the system they are currently a part of. We are contained within the boundries of our education, and indoctrination through the media. Anything that is outside the normal confines is considered a “fairy tale”. The problem therin lies.

    So, the first hurdle is to understand yourself, your own psychology, and your own past education.

    We have been formed and moulded by an education system designed to enslave the mind in a left brain compartmentalised cell. The master slave, if you will, that will manage his own slavery.

    Education, the media, advertising, Cinema and so on are all involved in this programme. If you can realise this, you can realise that you have to restart you education from scratch to get a balanced view on reality.

    Constantly battered by the left/right paradigm of politics, we find ourselves fumbling around inside this spectrum, unable to consider anything outside. It is Tsarions Political pigsty. A place to waste your thought and energy.

    The art of modern propaganda was formulated from Freud’s psychology by his nephew Edward Bernays, and his side kick Walter Lippman in 1915. This has been expanded on to great effect over the past century and has leeched into every field of view we have. Bertrand Russell sums all of this up quite nicely.

    “I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is mass psychology. Mass psychology is, scientifically speaking, not a very advanced study… This study is immensely useful to practical men, whether they wish to become rich or to acquire the government. It is, of course, as a science, founded upon individual psychology, but hitherto it has employed rule-of-thumb methods which were based upon a kind of intuitive common sense. Its importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda. Of these the most influential is what is called ‘education’. Religion plays a part, though a diminishing one; the Press, the cinema and the radio play an increasing part.” – Bertrand Russell, 1952

    I will be happy to contribute to a discussion and shall, but, understanding this alternative theory takes much more than grabbing a few snapshots and debunking them. It require laborious study.

  4. [...] See this post “Dissecting the New World Order Conspiracy” [...]

  5. AntiReptilian,

    Thanks again for your good comments and patient explanation of your point of view.

    I would first like to say that some people may be open to the idea that there is life on Mars! :)

    I think I agree with the main argument in your post, which is that people’s opinions are shaped in large part by especially the media, education. Cinema? Hmmm… I don’t see many movies so I don’t get what you mean exactly. Some movies seem to explicitly capitalize on conspiracy theory- like plotlines- take “DaVinci Code” as just one example.

    Advertising I think has the effect of influencing what people think is important in life (i.e. material things that can be bought) rather than really influencing their political beliefs. Maybe you have some examples to explain what you mean.

    But generally I agree with you that people are far too likely to be influenced by what they see on the news rather than really questioning what they see. But I think the media is also a difficult thing because, for example, TV is a limited medium, limited by time, and it is caught between people who say that it is too liberal and people who say that it is conservative and inaccurate. There is not enough time on TV, for example to represent all the opinions on a given subject. In fact, there are many issues that I think should be dealt with (for example international affairs) that get little coverage at all in the media.

    An even greater problem is that many people don’t care at all and don’t even take the time to watch or read the news.

    I did not attend the US public school system so I can’t comment directly on that. However, it is often said that the US educational system encourages “critical thinking”, at least when compared to educational systems in many other parts of the world, which are more based on rote memorization of facts.

    Perhaps that is why at least some people in the US are willing to consider these theories?

    I’m also not sure if I think it is as bad as you say- look at how many people believe the 9/11 conspiracy theories, or note the comment on the tendency of Westerners to question “the official story” in general.

    I agree that it would be good to study the idea more in depth, but as you know, there are many problems in the world and as humans, our time on this planet is short! Nevertheless other readers may choose to study this theory/idea in more depth if they think it is important.

    For me, I am generally open minded and even though I have doubts about this theory at this time, it doesn’t mean that I will change my mind in the future, if more evidence comes to light.

    As for religion, mass psychology, and the New World Order, I just wrote a new post talking about how this theory was mentioned by an Islamist in Indonesia. The report linked to in the article certainly relates to religion and mass psychology!

    I still stand by my main point that, although the groups like Bilderberg and the Trilateral Commission exist, we don’t know what they are talking about and what they are planning, so there is no way to confirm or deny this theory. Or perhaps you have some information (reports, minutes of meetings, etc.) which show what their plans are?

  6. Don’t ask yourself what the world needs. Ask yourself what makes you come alive, and then go and do that. Because what the world needs is people who have come alive.HaroldWhitmanHarold Whitman

  7. In the sunset of dissolution, everything is illuminated by the aura of nostalgia, even the guillotine.MilanKunderaMilan Kundera

  8. Anyone who thinks they’re important is usually just a pompous moron who can’t deal with his or her own pathetic insignificance and the fact that what they do is meaningless and inconsequential…WilliamThomasWilliam Thomas

  9. Well, it looks like the folks over at Congresscheck.com have been hitting this post with a lot of quotes linking to their website.

    Readers, it might be a website worth checking out- recent coverage includes links to the “impeachment” hearings in Congress.

    To the folks at Congresscheck.com- maybe you would like to leave a real comment instead of just a bunch of quotes (from Milan Kundera, etc.)?

    Thanks for your interest ; )

  10. PM
    In the 1970’s, General Electric was approached by the US administration to run investigations into brain wave activity. They found that after a few minutes of TV, the brain switched to an alpha wave pattern allowing suggestion and programming to take place based on the limbic emotional identification.

    See http://www.cognitiveliberty.org/5jcl/5JCL59.htm

    Advertising and marketing companies hailed Mulholland’s research and have used it to devestating effect. What i was talking about as far as advertising and television programming is the subconcious emotional reaction that people get from material displayed through television media.

    A good example is the case of news programming directed through the Bosnian episode. Across TV screens and newspapers we saw the images and footage of the “concentration camps”. If you were watching through that period, you will no doubt remember the emaciated man behind the wire. In fact, the TV crew had positioned themselves inside an enclosure and filmed out at the crowd who were free to come and go, and the emaciated chap was actually suffering from a condition that caused his appearence.

    The cry over the press was that Serbs were using concentration camps to imprison the victems of their campaign. The result, public support for the coalition action in the region. As ITN put it, ‘It was the evidence the world had been waiting for’

    See http://www.srpska-mreza.com/LM/LM102_ITN/LM102_ITN.html

    Fear is another primal driver that has been used to great effect. Tony Blairs fabricated 45 minute Nuclear holocaust was another example of emotional reaction.

    On the Think tanks, the CFR and the Club of Rome are good research areas. Both release articles and reports which can be studied and compared to international policy.

    For example, The Club of Rome released a publication called “The first Global revolution” in which they state,

    “In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself”

    So we see Al Gore leading the enviromental charge. Al Gore is Club Of Rome. Cut and Dried. Think tanks decide world policy. Think tanks act to influence targeted personalities and leaders and get them “on board” with the agenda.

    see http://green-agenda.com/globalrevolution.html

    Elite Families like the Rockefellers have created, funded and chaired many of the organisations we see operating behind the scenes. NGO’s are funded as a front to gain consensus on policy direction, and influence world policy. From Unesco and the WHO, to family planning and planned parenthood, we are under psychological attack.

    Think tanks are not apolitical. They have agendas. take a look at the Guardian Newspapers index of British think tanks, and thier purposes.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/page/2007/dec/20/1

  11. Hey Anti-Reptilian,

    I really appreciate your comments and I think it is an educational debate. You are bringing up some good points.

    I was aware of the effect of TV on people in terms of inducing a passive, receptive state. People in many countries, especially the US, watch far too much TV. This can make them accept ideas contained in it, which is more or less dangerous depending on the program.

    I wasn’t aware of the Bosnian “concentration camp” story, and am actually almost totally unaware of all of the Yugoslav wars, because at that time of my life I was more involved in theoretical studies. I read the link you provided, which was interesting. I’m not sure whether this would be evidence of a coordinated conspiracy to manipulate people, or just a single instance of dishonesty and bad journalism, caused by sensationalism. I can’t say because I have no evidence about what motives may have been behind that.

    The use of the word “enemy” in the Club of Rome quote is not a good one, but I don’t think the agenda they mention is a bad one, although it depends how it is carried out.

    On the think tanks point, at first I didn’t see why you felt they would be harmful. But I think what you’re trying to say is that they define the agenda, and what laws are passed, rather than the people of the country. This reflects the state of modern representative democracy, which, after reps are elected, are not necessarily in contact with their constituents. So a lot of decision making is out of the hands of the people, and influenced by think tanks.

    Please note that I am a “true democrat”, meaning that I think citizens should have much more direct control over laws, and I am developing a criticism of the representative democracy system. That is why I regularly advocate that the US should have a national referendum system, and that every state should be required to have a referendum process (not all states currently do).

    I would like for example, the Patriot Act to be put up to a referendum. And now that I am aware of the RFID chip, I also think that any mandated use of the chip should be approved directly by the public. I feel that under the representative democracy system, far too many things are really out of the hands of the citizens.

    That said, you and I could also found NGOs and lobby to affect laws, in which we would be more or less successful depending on our agenda, our funding and our skill.

    I guess in terms of the New World Order theory, it all comes down to the question of whether these elites in the think tanks are unified or whether they are somewhat divided, advocating diverse and sometimes conflicting things. My immediate reaction without studying it further is that there is evidence of significant division and conflict among these groups, at least on some issues.

    A mistake I think people sometimes make is assuming that funding recipients necessarily agree with the stated or unstated agenda of the donor. Having worked in NGOs before, I can see that the recipients do not necessarily agree with the agenda of their donor. In debates, for example, I sometimes see people say that: organization A receives its funding from the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), and hence the organization A is actually a front organization for the CIA! Which I think is stretching it a little bit.

    Anyway, I appreciate your points and I agree with you on some things. There are serous problems with the way information is presented, the access to certain kinds of information, and the way decisions are being made. These problems exist to a greater or lesser extent in all countries, and is something that we, as citizen activists, should be working to address.

    Any other reactions, comments, evidence or links would be welcome.


Leave a response

Your response:

Categories